In a significant development, Tesla shareholders have once again given the green light to Elon Musk’s massive $56 billion compensation package from 2018. This decision came during the annual meeting held at Tesla’s Texas gigafactory, where the announcement was met with enthusiastic applause and a standing ovation. Despite this approval, the fate of Musk’s compensation still hangs in the balance as a final court ruling in Delaware is awaited.
The Legal Battle
The story began in 2019 when Richard Tornetta, a Tesla shareholder, filed a lawsuit challenging the fairness of Musk’s pay package. Tornetta argued that Musk, who was juggling multiple roles in various companies, was receiving an excessive compensation for his part-time CEO role at Tesla. This led Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick to invalidate the package, highlighting that Tesla’s shareholders were not fully informed about Musk’s influence over the pay deal.
Musk’s Social Media Campaign
Support for Musk has been robust on social media platforms, with many fans and investors voicing their approval of the CEO’s compensation package. Musk himself engaged with these posts, which led Tesla to take additional steps to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. Despite this public support, legal challenges persist. Shareholders have filed lawsuits alleging insider trading and the diversion of Tesla resources to Musk’s other ventures, such as SpaceX and Neuralink.
Read also: Musk vs Apple: Elon Musk threatens to ban apple over chatgpt integration
Move to Texas
In a strategic move to mitigate further legal complications, Tesla has shifted its incorporation from Delaware to Texas. This decision followed Musk’s criticism of Delaware’s incorporation policies, which he aired on social media. After a poll conducted on X (formerly Twitter), where Musk proposed the relocation, Tesla officially made the move, anticipating a more favorable legal environment in Texas.
Shareholder Proposals
During the meeting, several shareholder proposals aimed at enhancing Tesla’s environmental, social, and governance (ESG) initiatives were brought forward. These included annual reporting on anti-harassment and discrimination efforts, adopting collective bargaining, and integrating sustainability metrics into executive compensation. However, all these proposals were rejected, aligning with the board’s recommendations. Tesla’s shareholders typically follow the board’s guidance in their voting.
Despite these rejections, two proposals did pass. Shareholders approved reducing director terms to one year and implementing simple majority voting provisions in Tesla’s governance documents. These changes aim to streamline Tesla’s governance and make it more responsive to shareholder interests.
Conclusion
Tesla’s re-approval of Elon Musk’s $56 billion compensation package marks another chapter in the ongoing saga of legal battles and corporate strategy. While the company continues to face scrutiny and lawsuits, the shift to Texas and the recent shareholder votes indicate a new phase for Tesla, driven by its ambitious CEO.
Visit Techcrunch To Read More